Enlightenment in Five Verses - Part Two

Please read part one of this blog before reading this part and subsequent parts.

Sri Shankara answers to the questions posed by the Chandala:

Verse 1

1.जग्रत्स्वप्न्सुषुप्तिषु स्फुत्तारा या संविदुज्ज्रुम्भ्ते
या ब्रह्मिदिपिपीलिकान्त्त्नुशु प्रोता जगत्साक्षिणी ।
सैवाहं न च दुश्यवास्त्विती दृढप्रज्ञापि यस्यास्ति चेत
चन्दलोअस्तु स तु द्विजोअस्तु गुरुरित्येषा मनीषा मम ॥ १ 

If a person has attained the firm knowledge that he is not the object of perception, but instead is the one Consciousness which illumines the three states of waking, dream and deep sleep, the one Consciousness which is the sole witness of the whole universe and is the one Consciousness which dwells in all bodies from that of the Creator Brahma to that of an ant, the he alone is my Guru, irrespective of whether he is an outcaste or a brahmin. This is my conviction.

Let us try to analyze this verse. Consciousness is present in all the three states of waking, dream and deep sleep. In the waking state, the physical body, the senses and the mind function and experience the external objects. In the dream state, the body and the senses do not function, but the mind creates objects and events and experiences them. In deep sleep, the body, the senses and the mind do not function but there is no doubt that consciousness is still present since one easily verifies upon waking up  that he or she was asleep.  Simply put, in the waking state, the presence of consciousness is obvious because of the experience of the external objects and in the dream state, the mind creates the objects and experiences them. In the deep sleep state, it may appear as if there is no experiencing, but the fact that you remember you slept happily, is the verification of the presence of experiencing.  One can remember only what one has experienced previously. It is therefore obvious that consciousness was present during deep sleep and both happiness and ignorance were experienced.  This one consciousness is the sole witness of all experiences as well as absence of experiences. This consciousness is the inner Self that dwells in all creatures and is the same, irrespective of the shape or form of the body of the creature. Thus, this one consciousness is the only subject. The external objects are perceived by the senses. The senses are perceived by the mind. The mind is perceived by consciousness or the Self. Thus, the Self or consciousness alone is the subject and everything else is an object of experience. The person who has realized that he is the Self (consciousness alone) and not the physical body, the mind, or the senses is an enlightened person and is my Guru. 

The labels of race, religion, caste, occupation, and creed are only illusory creations of the mind and in no way affect the Self or consciousness which is the same in all living beings. Similarly, differences in form or shapes is an illusion created by the mind, since the bodies of living creatures are made up of the same five elements (earth, fire, water, space and air) and therefore have no inherent difference. Just like space is space and there is no difference in the space contained within a pot made of gold versus the space contained in a pot made of clay, an enlightened person sees beyond the name and form and recognizes the one consciousness in all.

Enlightenment in Five Verses- Part One

This post deals with one of the most profound yet simple Advaita teaching. It comes from Shri Adi Shankaracharya, the great Advaita Saint. The teaching is contained in just a few verses, which if read carefully, keeping the mind and heart open, may result in instant enlightenment.  These are some of the most profound verses in all of Advaita Vedanta literature.  The text is called Maneeshaapanchakam. The essence of Advaita Vedanta is brought out succinctly in these brief verses.

Before we proceed, let us see the reason for these verses. One day, Sri Shankaracharya ( aka Shankara) was on his way to the temple of Lord Viswanatha along with his disciples, after finishing his ritual bath. It so happened that a Chandaala (a low caste person or untouchable caste working as a street sweeper) was walking along the same street and was obstructing the path along which Sri Sankara was walking. Sri Sankara asked the Chandaala to move away from his path (In ancient times, it was considered inauspicious for a higher caste person to encounter a Chandaala especially on the way to or after performing religious rituals). The Chandaala then asked Sri Sankara some questions which are the basis of the first two verses in this text. These questions are the prelude to the Five verses quoted by Sri Sankara. The Five verses are collectively called "Maneeshaapanchakam".  Maneeshaa means "conviction" and  "panchakam" means a collection of five verses or shlokas. All the five verses end with the word "maneesha mamah" meaning "This is my conviction".

While, one could spend a lot of time arguing over how an Enlightened soul like Sri Shankara could practice untouchability, it would unnecessarily deviate one's attention from the deep message contained in these verses.  The story may also point to the strong association of beingness with the body and mind, showing how even an Enlightened one like Sri Shankara could temporarily fall off the razors edge.

Chandala to Shankara:

1. अन्नामयादान्नमयम्थ्वा चैतन्यमेव चैतान्यात । 
द्विजवर दूरीकर्तु वाञछ्सी किं ब्रूहि गच्छ गच्छेति ॥

1.  O'great among the twice-born! What is it that you want to move away by saying "Go, go"? Do you want the body made up of food to move away from another body made up of food? Or, do you want the consciousness to move away from consciousness?

2.  किं गंगाम्बुनी बिम्बितेओम्ब्र्मनौ चंदाल्वातिपयः
पूरे चंत्रमस्ती कच्च्न्घतिम्रित्कुम्भ्योवोर्म्ब्रे।
प्रत्याग्वस्तुनी निस्तारान्ग्सह्जान्न्दाव्बोधाम्बुधौ
विप्रोअयम्श्व्प्चोअय्मित्य्पिमहन्कोअयम्विभेद्भ्रमः ॥

2. Is there any difference in the reflection of the Sun in the waters of the Ganges river and its reflection in the water in a ditch in the quarters of an outcaste? Is there any difference in the space as such, be it the space contained in a gold pot or a clay pot?  What is this illusion of difference in the form of "this is a Brahmin(higher caste) and this is an Outcaste", in the inner Self which is none other than the thought-less Ocean of Bliss and self existing consciousness?

Note: The inner Self or consciousness is the same in all creatures.

Open the Window to the Heart

Is it not true that many a seeker is floundering around in the darkness of ignorance? For those of you who have understood that the world arises in you due to ignorance, it is evident that only by SEEING the Light within will the darkness be dispelled. Although, it may seem like an impossible task to SEE within, it is actually very simple and very obvious to anyone who has a sincere and earnest desire to do so. It is just a matter of turning your attention from the sensory objects to within. The Light within is what illumines the sensory objects. It is the Light within that makes the sensory objects of the world appear to you.

By turning one's attention inwards, the very obvious and self shining consciousness becomes evident. For, is it not true that without being conscious there would be no world of objects for anyone? By turning one's attention away from the world of objects and focusing on the lightless Light within, one merges in the Light. There is no "me" left to describe the Light within. Just the bliss of merging in the Light within. The duality is lost in the Oneness that envelops all around. In the Oneness, there is pure bliss beyond description but yet fully obvious and simple to SEE.

The Heart is where the Light is. The Heart is the Self. The fact that you know that you are is because of the Heart. It is not the physical or anatomical heart but a reference to the Self within - the heart of it all. All that is needed is to open the window to the Heart. It is already ever shining within. Just LOOK and SEE. Simple as can be.

True Meditation

You are all perhaps aware of meditation. So much is written about it and talked about. There are so many different types of meditation that a whole book can be written about it. The classic example of meditation may be aptly described as an act in which the meditator is meditating on an object of meditation. The whole purpose is to supposedly concentrate the mind on one single object. True, doing concentration of the mind on an object will improve concentration. But, it will get you nowhere near the Truth. Almost everyone thinks of meditation as an act that is accomplished by sitting in one position, in a quiet place or walking in a quiet place and keeping the thought focused on an object. The object could be anything like an idol of your favorite Deity or a color or just abstract images. So, what is the problem of meditating in this manner, you may ask.

To begin with, meditation means to think or contemplate or ponder about.  When you realize that meditation is just a process of contemplation or pondering, you realize that this can be done literally anywhere. No doubt, having a quieter surroundings will initially aid in allowing one to ponder on a subject or object.  But as you will see later on in this discussion, it is not necessary to be in one place or position or environment to be meditating. Meditation can be done right in the middle of a busy traffic intersection for all that matters.

The most important thing in meditation is to meditate on the meditator. Yes, that is right. Meditate on the meditator that is "you" or your self.  So, how to go about doing this? Keep asking your self the question, "Who is it that is meditating?". No doubt, the answer will be "I am meditating". Then the next question will be to ask your self "Who is this I?" or " Who am I?". In asking this question, you are not just letting the mind wander all over the place. Your aim is to find out the source of the "I".  Keep the mind fixed on the source of "I".  Perhaps you could ask the question " Where is this I arising from?".  In doing so, the mind becomes still and merges with its source. The meditator and the object of meditation become ONE.  This is true meditation.

With constant practice, it becomes possible to do this inquiry, or contemplation, or pondering, or meditation, or whatever else you may want to call this practice, in any place and at any time. In fact, the meditator ceases to exist as a separate entity from the object of meditation (which in this case is the Source of the I).

True meditation should be constant till clarity and peace itself become part of your waking hours. The feeling that you are meditating should subside gradually and all that is left is pure beingness in all its glory.

If Only I could Kill My Ego

As you may be aware by reading through the Advaita literature, that a lot of advice is given on how it is important to kill the ego as the means of Self Realization. Let us look at this topic in our discussion today. The ego is nothing but the "I-thought" or the idea of being an individual. In fact, the ego and the mind are one and the same. Why? The first thought which is the basis of all other thoughts is the thought- "I". When the first person, I, arises, all other thoughts arise and are all linked to this primary thought - "I". Therefore, it is essential to decipher the source of this very first thought, or the "I- thought" as the way to realizing one's True Nature or Self Realization as it is called. The ego is the first person, the I, or the individual that one believes oneself to be. The ego makes one believe that he or she is a separate entity with substance and its own independent existence.

The very idea that you being the ego, will somehow go about and kill the ego is itself ludicrous.  There is no doubt that the ego trying to kill itself would be a futile exercise since it would be similar to suicide, though not physically. Well, that is not the goal of Self Realization, certainly!  If all who have Realized their Self would be dead, then there should have been no one to pass on this Knowledge to others? As Ramana Maharshi has said, the ego trying to kill the ego is similar to a thief pretending to be the policeman and wanting to catch the thief. There can be nothing more ridiculous. But, despite this very obvious statement, many a seeker still wants to be deluded into believing that somehow the ego can be controlled or killed.  Because of this misunderstanding, the seeker will try to somehow seek out a method (or sadhana) to do so. After going around in circles, as would be not surprising considering the very nature of the goal in mind, the seeker becomes frustrated and helpless. Many others will say that Advaita teaching is impractical and still others may say that it is a fatalistic philosophy.  Unfortunately, many a seeker has been led astray because of misunderstanding of the teachings.

This statement about the ego needs clarification for many. The ego cannot and should not be sought out for destruction in some way. Instead, it is essential for one to find out if the ego has any existence apart from the consciousness.  Does the ego have any substance or independent nature apart from consciousness? Is it not true that you have to be conscious to know you exist as an individual? In this realm of consciousness, the idea of being a first person- "I", arises. This "I" is nothing but the thought- I, or the ego. A thought has no substance. Look for it and SEE for yourself.  A thought has no substance and has no independent existence apart from consciousness.  When there are no thoughts including the "I-thought", you still exist. Try it and see. Stop all thoughts even for a moment. You do not fall apart.

When sincerely inquired into, the ego is like a ghost. It vanishes like the ghost which never existed in the first place. And yet, there is no denying that there is awareness or the sense of being without being this or that. This stillness, which is pure beingness, is experienced by all when the "I-thought" subsides, however transient it may be. So, the question finally arises, why and how would you want to kill something that doesn't exist?  Why kill the ego when it is unreal and has no existence apart from consciousness? Why not instead investigate and find out the nature of the ego and realize that it is like a ghost? How can you kill a ghost?  So, give up the idea of killing the ego or the mind, and instead focus on inquiring into the nature of the ego or the mind.

Awareness is Self Evident

Awareness is self evident.  It indicates that contains its own proof of existence without any other need for demonstration. It is not only self evident but most obvious meaning easily recognized. At this very moment, the reader is aware. No one needs to point out to you, the reader, that you are aware. Can you deny your awareness at this very moment? Obviously, not! Then, why is it that you are in search for the most obvious and self evident? Aha! Here is something that now needs to be investigated by none other than you. Thats right. YOU are going to investigate who is it that wants to seek out awareness. There lies the answer and an end to the seeking.

Awareness has no particular shape, size, form or name. It is not something that can be grasped by the mind in the objective sense. If you are asked " Are you aware?", you answer, " yes, I am aware". If only you could stop there, the answer would be complete. But, then, you go on to answer " I am aware. I am John (or so and so)". If it would make it easier for you to understand, perhaps you could replace the word 'aware' with the word 'awake' and yet it would lead you to the same understanding. What did you do to be aware or awake? Did not awareness or wakefulness just come spontaneously? If you try to attach any attribute to awareness, all you come up with is nothing.  There are no attributes that you can add to awareness when left as it is. Awareness just is. No denying of the fact that you are aware, right now and right here.

Now, you may wonder, how a "me" came into the picture.  Precisely, a "me" comes and goes, and yet the awareness remains. This is evident to everyone, in the state of deep sleep there is no "me" and yet there is awareness. Every perception including perception of thoughts happens in awareness. Thoughts come and go and yet awareness remains as it is. Yet it is a strange mystery of nature, that in this awareness, the "I-thought" is somehow considered to be a real entity with substance and independence. Because, the "I-thought" is considered to be something substantial,  a story is built on this "I-thought".  This "I-thought" which is nothing but a transient, non-entity called "me" or "mine", wants to seek and find awareness in the world of objects and other perceptions. This "me" completely forgets wherefrom it came into the field of perception. The "me" is but a transient thought with no substance or independence by itself. Can one have thoughts without awareness? Are not thoughts by themselves an object of awareness? Amazing, isn't it?

So, self inquiry or the investigation of the self is not into awareness (which you already are), but into establishing the falseness of the "I" or the "me" or "mine". The awareness is self shining like the sun. One does not need a lamp to go out to look for sunlight. In the same way, awareness is obvious and self evident. What is needed is just an investigation into the nature of one's delusion into thinking that one is an individual entity.  Rather, why not just be as you are, just the pure awareness? 

Consciousness is All There Is

All there is, is consciousness. It means that whatever is perceived is because of consciousness and is a content of consciousness. The contents of consciousness cannot be anything other than consciousness. There can be no world without the body. There can be no body without the mind. The mind is nothing but a bundle of thoughts. The mind creates the idea of individuality. Because of this creation of individuality or the first Person, the "I-thought", there is an idea of separation of the individual from the rest of creation. Because, there is a first Person, there is the idea of a second person, and third person and so on and so forth. There cannot be a mind without consciousness. Consciousness is the source of the mind.  Finally, there cannot be consciousness without the Absolute. The Absolute is the Ultimate Truth or Reality.

When the great Sages of the past talked about individual or personal consciousness versus universal consciousness, they were trying to make it easier for the seeker to understand the essence of the teaching of Advaita or non-duality from the perspective of the relative since the seeker thinks everything is relative to him or her. Actually, there is no such thing as individual or personal consciousness. Consciousness is consciousness. So, what creates the idea of individuality? The consciousness (which is the same everywhere) identifies with the body and this identity is established through the ego or the I-thought. By creation of the ego, the unlimited consciousness now believes itself to be a limited entity, the body and creates the idea of being a person, a first person -"I".  Thereby, begins all the miseries for this so called individual. Now, this individual, the first person, which is nothing but a thought (the "I-thought"), pretends to be the doer of actions and the reaper of the fruits of the actions and in doing so wants to avoid unhappiness and believes that eternal or unending happiness can be achieved by pursuing a course of right action. And thinking that the body is the form representing him or her, this individual goes through the repeated cycles of misery and suffering.  This non-entity called "I", now wants to seek out the Real Self. Really? Now, how can there be two selves? It is amazing indeed that being the Reality, you want to seek out the Reality!  Strange is this world indeed! The Guru comes along and advises careful inquiry into the nature and source of this very individual by the individual, and then it becomes clear that there is actually no individual at all in the first place. The ego is like a ghost which vanishes upon searching for it.  The mind has created the idea of being an individual entity where none exists. Then this individual believing itself to be suffering wants to pursue sadhana (or spiritual practice) to get out of this suffering and misery by seeking out the Reality.  Is it not clear that the whole idea of a seeker and seeking is just playing out in the mind. No mind, no seeker, no seeking- just being.

In self-inquiry, one is looking for the source of the ego. In doing so, the ego vanishes and is replaced by the unlimited, expanse of consciousness which takes over and there is immediate realization of the Real Self as the cause of this universe. There is no sense of an "I' when the mind is turned inwards to its Source.  The mind, in turning inwards to the Source, actually disappears in favor of the Real Self or the consciousness. If all is consciousness, who are you?