Enlightenment in Five Verses- Part Three

Please read the preceding parts of this blog before proceeding to read this one. This is Part Three.

Verse 2

ब्रह्मैवाह्मिदम जगच्च सकलं चिन्मत्रिविस्तारितं
सर्वं चैताद्विध्य्या त्रिगुनायोशेषं मया कल्पितम ।
इथं यस्य दृढा मतिः सुखतरे नित्ये परे निर्मले
चन्दलोअस्तु स तु द्विजोअस्तु गुरुरित्येषा मनीषा मम ॥ २

I am Brahman or pure consciousness. It is the pure consciousness that appears as this universe. This play of universe is conjured up by me because of ignorance (avidya) and expressed by the three Gunas or Attributes (sattva, rajas and tamas) of the mind. One who has attained this definite realization about Brahman, which is bliss itself, eternal, supreme and pure, is indeed my Guru, whether he is an outcaste or a brahmin. This is my conviction.

Verse 3

शास्वन्न्स्वरमेवा विश्वमखिलं निश्चित्य वाचा गुरोः
नित्यं ब्रह्म निरंतरं विमृशता निव्याज्शान्तात्मना ।
भूतं भावि च दुष्क्रुतं प्रदहता संविन्मये पावके
प्ररब्धाय समर्पितं स्वव्पुरित्येशा मनीषा मम ॥ ३

He who has come to the definite conclusion, after reflecting on his Guru's word, that the universe is permanently in a state of flux and change and is perishable; he who with a calm and pure mind constantly meditates on Brahman; he who has burnt all his past and future residual tendencies (vaasanas) in the fire of Pure Knowledge, submits his present body to live through and exhaust its present destiny, he alone is my Guru, whether he is an outcaste or a brahmin. This is my conviction.

This verse may need some explaining since the verse states that the enlightened person merely submits his or her body to the operation of Praarabdha Karma. You are probably already familiar with the concept of Karma. Karma can be loosely defined as the results of actions or the destiny based on actions. There are three categories of Karma. (1) Sanchita Karma - the accumulated results of actions in past births. (2) Praarabdha Karma - the results of past actions which have given rise to the present body and (3) Aagaami Karma - the results of actions performed in the present birth. For a person who upon contemplating on the words of the Guru has attained the Ultimate or Pure Knowledge of the Self, Sanchita and Aagaami karma (upto the time of attainment of Knowledge) are completely destroyed. After the dawn of Self Knowledge, any action performed does not produce any result in the form of merit or demerit. However, the second category of Praarabdha Karma is not destroyed upon attainment of Self Knowledge, and must be exhausted by living through the experiences of the present body. Once the Praarabdha Karma is exhausted, the body of the enlightened person falls and the jivanmukta (the one who is liberated while still having a body) becomes videhamukta ( one who is liberated after leaving the body).  Simply put, one who has attained Self Knowledge is no longer the Do-er of actions and hence there are no more merits or demerits attached to the actions of the body or mind, since he is neither the body nor the mind.

Verse 4

या तियार्न्ग्नार्देव्ताभिराह्मित्यांतः स्फुटा गृह्यते
यभ्दासा हृदयाक्ष्देहविश्या भांति स्वतोअचेतनाः ।
तां भास्यैः पिहितार्क्मंदाल्निभां स्फूर्ति सदा भावयन
योगी निवृत्मंसो हि गुरुरित्येषा मनीषा मम ॥ ४

The Self or pure consciousness is experienced as the "I" by all creature, plants, animals, humans and angels. It is by the Light of this pure consciousness that the inert and insentient body, mind and senses appear to be sentient. Just like the sun which illumines everything even if hidden behind a bank of clouds, the Self is concealed by the very mind, senses and body which it illuminates. The yogi, who with a quiet and calm mind always meditates on this Self, is my Guru. This is my conviction.

The sun is responsible for the production of clouds by evaporation of the water in the oceans. The clouds are visible because of the light of the sun. The same clouds may however hide the sun from our view. In the same way, the body, mind, and senses which owe their sentiency to the Self may conceal the Self by becoming absorbed in the world of objects. The Self can be realized by withdrawing the mind and senses from the external world.

Verse 5

यात्सौख्याम्बुधिलेश्लेशत इमे श्कद्यो निव्रुता
याच्चित्ते नितरां प्रशान्त्कालने लब्ध्वा मुनिनिर्व्रुतः ।
यस्मिन्नित्यासुखाम्बुधाऊ गलित्धिब्रह्मैव न ब्रह्मविद
यः कश्सित्सा सुरेंद्रव्न्दित्प्दो नूनं मनीषा मम ॥ ५

The yogi's mind experiences that Ocean of Bliss during moments of total stillness. That Ocean of Bliss is verily Brahman and a tiny droplet from which is sufficient to make Indra and others feel contented and happy. Such a person whose mind has become dissolved in this Ocean of Bliss is not a mere Knower of Brahman but Brahman itself.  Such a rare one whose feet are fit to be worshipped even by the King of Gods, he alone is my Guru. This is my conviction.

The knower of Brahman is one who knows that one is not the body-mind complex but Brahman itself. Hence, knowing Brahman means one who remains as Brahman.  In fact, everyone is Brahman, but they do not know it. It is not the attainment of a new state as such. Liberation or Moksha is nothing but removal of false identification with the body-mind complex. By removal of this false identification, one realizes one's own True Nature which is the infinite Ocean of Bliss, i.e. Brahman itself. In this classic example in advaita literature, a coiled up rope is mistaken for a snake when a man encounters a rope in the dim light of  dusk, and gets panicked. However, when the same rope is examined in bright light, it becomes evident that it is only a rope and not a snake.  It is not that the snake was there and it disappeared after examining the rope in light. There never was a snake to begin with and the whole idea was a creation of the mind. In the same way, one mistakenly thinks of oneself as a Jiva (individual) who is in bondage. But when one does self inquiry, it becomes evident that one always was and will be Brahman and it was just the wrong notion of being an individual that has disappeared in the light of knowledge. There never was an individual who is in bondage to begin with. It was just ignorance that created the concept of bondage and being an individual. Thus there is no such thing as bondage or liberation just like there never was any snake in the rope.

TAT TVAM ASI- THAT THOU ART

Tat tvam Asi or 'That thou art' is a Mahavaakya (Great Pronouncement or Great Saying) in Vedanta Advaita literature. It is originally mentioned in the Chandogya Upanishad as a dialogue between Uddalaka and his son, Shvetaketu. In any case, the reason this author has brought this up is to emphasize the simplicity and depth of the meaning behind this simple pronouncement. Just mulling over this Mahavaakya can be in itself all that a seeker needs. However, it is imperative for the seeker to understand the meaning of each of these words, the placement of the words in the sentence and how to approach the process of assimilation of the profundity of this statement.

TAT is That or the Reality or Brahman or whatever label you may want to give the eternal Reality that is self evident to all. THOU is the "you" or the "me". This "me" is also called the Jiva (pronounced as 'Jeeva'). What you mistakenly take yourself to be is this Jiva or the personality or the individual. At its very essence, the Mahavaakya is self explanatory. Note that this statement starts with a That rather than Thou. Meaning thereby that what IS, or THAT is already present BEFORE a 'Thou' (or a 'you' or 'me') arises. The Mahavaakya can lose its meaning if translated as "Thou are That" or "you are That", as is often seen in Advaita literature. Translating it in this manner gives substance to the feeling that there is actually a 'you' or 'thou' or 'me'. The seeker continues to think that he/she is an entity with some substance and independent nature and begins to analyze the statement from that reference point of a 'me'. Unfortunately, this just reinforces the concept or the sense of a 'me' or an 'individual', which defeats the very purpose of this statement. Of course, one could argue that this placement of words in this Mahavaakya is due to Sanskrit grammar and has nothing to do with the essential meaning of the statement or how this author has proposed that it should be interpreted. But remember that language is just a mode of communication and one can go on arguing endlessly about irrelevant topics thereby failing to see what is being pointed to.

The meaning of the Mahavaakya is clear when pointed out that before a thought of a 'me' can arise, I already AM. If one can just stick with the identity of THAT, then there is no question of identifying with what arises or comes after THAT. If one starts off as THAT and sticks to it, and then understands that what arises as an 'I-thought' (or a 'me') is nothing but just a thought, the meaning becomes immediately clear. All thoughts, actions, feelings, emotions, or anything else can BE, only if THAT is there to start with. THAT is always and eternally the Present. What can one say if the identity with THAT is established once and for all? One can only say that " I am every thing and no thing in particular".

For some seekers, this direct pointing out works wonders and hence this simple three word sentence has been labeled a Mahavaakya. As THAT, one realizes that he/she is nothing but just the Pure Awareness. The he/she cannot exist apart from THAT/Pure Awareness. Just ponder over this powerful pointer.